On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:44:13 -0400 MÃirÃn Duffy wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 09:08 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > > A lot of people like the timed swapping of content such as you > > have in the top half of the page, but I have to say I always > > find it irritating. The timer never has any idea if I'm half > > way through looking at something when it swaps it out :-). > > One thing you might discover is that the slideshow pauses if your mouse > is anywhere within its boundaries. > > It might be nice to have a pause button though. Do you think that would > improve it for you? Probably wouldn't hurt, but I usually get annoyed by slideshows before I notice if there is a pause button or not. More of a personal preference for static pages I guess, lots of people seem to like them though, certainly I find them on lots of web sites. > > > In page 1 of the content, I think it is reaching a bit to > > describe fedora with the word "stable". I wouldn't consider > > any release with a 6 month release cycle as "stable", and > > googling in the fedora user's list could probably find thousands > > of messages with people jumping on users running fedora as > > a server telling them they should use centos or rhel if > > they want a stable release for a server. > > But we don't state anywhere that it's meant for a server. It's really > not. Server use was really just an example. There are messages like this: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2008-February/022721.html from time to time all through the fedora user's archives. I just found that example in about 10 seconds of searching. The concept of "stable" is constantly ridiculed in the user list when someone has the audacity to complain about things changing, so it just seemed a weird word to find in the fedoraproject front page. I think the word "stable" would be better off replaced with something like "cutting edge" in that first slide. > > ~m > > -- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
