Thanks to the original reporter for your concern, I'd like to take a chance to explain why we work as we do. On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:56:30AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > AFAIK the site has looked fine under chrome in Linux the entire time; > there was a Windows-related rendering issue in Chrome that reports > indicate has since been resolved. It is also worth noting that progress is made by progressing and not going backward. Part of the open source development methodology as we practice it is to make changes and fix the bugs they introduce. If we wait until everything is perceived by us as being perfect and complete before we release it, we would be following a different methodology. The fact is, a lot of work went in to making this site work and be useable when it went up. But it's guaranteed that something is going to break. Because the problems people are experiencing have been fixed so quickly, it's a sign that the methodology we are practicing is working. Going backward wouldn't get us moving forward. I hope that helps you understand why we move forward even with the risk of breaking. - Karsten -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener team: Red Hat Community Architecture uri: http://TheOpenSourceWay.org/wiki gpg: AD0E0C41
Attachment:
pgpXo6Kj2YM9K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
