On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 16:02 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > Hi Felix! > > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 07:33 +0200, Felix Kaechele wrote: > > I have some questions about the way the regions are split up on the page. > > Why not keep the groups of countries (continents) in the structure that > > we regularily use when talking about Ambassador regions? That being > > APAC, EMEA, LATAM, NA. > > For example in your mockup Europe and Africa & Middle East are seperate. > > The americas comprise of NA and LATAM. > > I do understand that splitting them up by continent makes sense too, but > > it would be more coherent with our existing structures IMO. > > That's a really great idea. I did the continent split bceause I thought > it might be the least-controversial way to do it, but I think splitting > out by ambassador region makes more sense. Although it means the NA > section is going to be *very* sparse, hehe. Splitting by continents, > each section is individually a bit beefier than the Ambassador region > split. But I think the consistency of splitting by Ambassador region is > more valuable so I'll modify the mockup to employ that scheme! Here's some static HTML mockups using the scheme Felix suggested: http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/webdesign/fedoracommunity.org/html/16Aug2010/ What do you think? Does it work? North America looks a little weird... how do you think it should be handled, or do you think it's fine? Also do you notice any missing countries? India doesn't seem to have a site? :( ~m -- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
