Hi Anirban, Anirban Brahmachari wrote: > As of 17th June 2009 0848 hrs IST, the page > "http://fedoraproject.org/en/verify" had some outdated information. > I believe that this was because of the changing of signing keys that > happened a few months back. > Parts of the following section seems outdated to me : > _________________________________________ > > The CHECKSUM file should have a good signature from one of the > following keys: > > * |D22E77F2| - Fedora 11 > * |4EBFC273| - Fedora 10 > * |0B86274E| - Fedora 10 pre-releases > * |4F2A6FD2| - Fedora 9 and earlier > * |30C9ECF8| - Fedora 9 and earlier pre-releases > > ______________________________________________ > > It should be updated with data from the page > "http://fedoraproject.org/en/keys". > > Please do take a look. It can confuse beginners. Can you be more specific about what you think is outdated? I believe that the information there is correct, but if it's not, I'd be happy to help get it fixed. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds... -- Samuel Adams
Attachment:
pgp64HO6JATVC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list