On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 19:49 -0400, Mairin Duffy wrote: > Juan Camilo Prada Ojeda wrote: > > Im open to any feedback you can provide > > > > [1] - http://jprada.fedorapeople.org/out/en/get-fedora > > [2] - http://publictest15.fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora > > This doesn' t look like: > > http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/webdesign/get-fedora/ There may have been some confusion from the last meeting on IRC? I saw some ambivalence. My best recollection from discussions here is that Mairin's design had the consensus, mainly because it was focused on doing less with less. It pushes aside everything but "get this one thing now." The wizard/choice tree approach seems to work best with a divided audience with variations on need. Our highest goal for get-fedora is different, though: two uses cases ("I don't know what I need","I know just what I need"); we're serving the don't-know people on the one page; and pushing all the content for do-know people to specialty pages. If we had a Fedora Live for 64-bit and PPC, does the Apache session capture the architecture of the client? That might be an interesting one, to offer an arch-specific download. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Community Gardener Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
