On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:32 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > Replying for discussion on the websites list: > > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This question is asked in the context of > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pertusus/Draft_keeping_infra_open_for_EOL > > which has not already been approved by FESCO, so this could have no > > follow-up, though I think that this issue is also relevant for EPEL. > > > > Till raised an interesting issue associated with adding more releases in > > bodhi: each release takes some place in the left menu. Another could > > still be right, but I think that 4 or more will certainly be > > problematic. Has this issue already been considered? What is the plan > > for EPEL when it switches to using bodhi? In addition to being there > > there will be in the end 3 to 5 EPEL versions in parallel so this is > > certainly an issue that will arise. > > > > Any comment, idea? Could this not be solved by something AJAXy? Click on the release you want to deal with and then (and only then) the submenu appears? Any browsers/lynx that can handle that, can see the full menu though. > > > > If it ends up that for the proposal (or for EPEL) another bodhi server > > has to be set up, can you tell if it is easy rather easy to set up and > > administer or rather hard? > > > > What does the websites team think? > > -Mike > -- Nigel Jones <dev@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
