On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 18:46 +0200, Max Spevack wrote: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > > I was wondering if there is anyway we could standardize the meeting > > time? I wonder if staggering it has lead to more people who would > > actually attend not being able to attend (due to confusion over what > > time it is this week or other obligations). > > I would love to standardize the meeting time, but the last few times I > brought this up, it was voted down due to too many timezone differences. > > Maybe we can split the difference and just have it at 21:00 UTC every > week, instead of alternating between 20:00 and 22:00? IIRC, that would knock out both groups of people who were served by the split time. I recall transit between locations being a primary situation. This is a perennial problem, with each group beating on it every time they want to set a meeting. I'm wondering what else we can try or offer in the pool if ideas? * Meet twice a week at two different times (and days), then synthesize the meetings via mailing list. * Have one meeting that goes extra long (we tried this in Docs to a limited success.) * Introduce voice so that people who are in transit without Internet can call in and participate. ... ? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
