Re: Comments from slashdot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2008-05-18 12:23:06 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=556388&cid=23450894
> 
> That one is specific to websites (just throwing it out there) but the rest
> of the conversation is also interesting.
Aw, the fedora.org/fedora.com comment just hurts.  I'm sure that this
has been asked/done before, but have we ever spoken to the owners of
those domains?  What kind of response did we get?  

The get-fedora comment is definitely valid, though (and it's good to see
some progress being made in this area).  I took another look at
opensuse's download page (http://software.opensuse.org/), and I'm
starting to like it more and more.  I don't think the 4 steps look very
indimidating to users at all, and I like that they don't bother too much
with fancy animations (as a side-affect of this, there's already a
reasonable default download link at the bottom, so you only need one
click to download the i386 install DVD).  

Any thoughts on this?
Ricky

Attachment: pgpG2Z15Iz6S7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux