On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 23:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > > > We could use the CC BY-SA. CSS seems to fall in that category, no > > warranty assurance required, etc., and it clearly requires some > > attribution in the reusage. > > That sounds like a very good idea. I seem to have deleted the original question in this thread. Anyone have it to reply back? We can tell him it's OK to use the CSS, that we intend to make that clear by stating the license on the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites page as well as within future versions of the CSS, and be sure to do as he says, that is, not infringe upon any Fedora marks. Or should we have a discussion on f-websites-l first? I'm unclear if this email actually goes to that list. :) - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
