On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 14:28 +0400, Laith Juwaidah wrote: > I think that the documentations, i.e.: Guidelines (Packaging, Translation, > Installation (yes, installation guide, like the one here[1])), We already have an installation guide and it doesn't benefit from being worked on the wiki. The one you link to here couldn't be used, it's pretty scary. > Release Notes, > etc... Should be edited on the wiki, and when they reach their final form, > they are transferred from the wiki to docs.fedoraproject.org. Some content benefits from the wiki for drafting. Anything the length of a guide or long tutorial suffers on the wiki. > This may sound crazy but, why don't you move the contributors' pages to some > static pages? Say, on their fedorapeople spaces, that way, they can customize > them ;) and it'll be easier for whoever wants to view them, since it'll be > just username.fedorapeople.org, for those who can't design their own pages, > fedora-websites can be asked to create a template for them, not to mention > that they can create a tiny webpage there, where they can have links to > whatever they have in their space... True, we could do that. The wiki pages were used initially because that was all we had. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
