On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 08:38 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > Karsten Wade wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 22:11 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > >> All of the "download" links on this page: > >> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/ > > > > BTW, this site is under the purview of FDP, as a joint-venture with > > Infra and Websites. > > > >> should refer to http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora.html > > > > s/sh/c/ > > > Fair enough... sorry if I came in too strong. > > I was looking at all of this from the perspective of someone with little > familiarity with Fedora and also trying to keep with the new simplified > approach of "less information equals more" :) Sure! I was just making it clear that, yes, a decision needs to be made about what the canonical "get Fedora" URL is we pass around, and no, I don't think the decision has been made. Or has it? Maybe it has. :) > Why not call it: "Docs" Fedora Documentation? I just updated HEAD in CVS; that should update the main site, and most/some mirrors will pick up the content later. In essence, "Help" was misleading, why not just call a duck a duck instead of a fowl? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
