-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rahul Sundaram schreef: > Bart Couvreur wrote: >> >> Why link? Shouldn't we just add them to the site? As in keeping the >> people on our site, not Red Hat's, which makes the line between Red Hat >> and Fedora somewhat less obscure, imho. > > Red Hat handles press releases for Fedora which has a budget around that > and won't spread much without the contacts already well established. > Leverage it is IMO better. Understood > >> On a totally unrelated note, should we get our heads round L10N? Or not? > > As in having a static version of L10N page or have L10N versions of this > pages? I would rather not do the former and the latter should definitely > be done. One more reason to get the website launched early. > The latter was indeed what I meant. Apache has some nice things to do an automated check off the language a give the right one (based on browser-settings). Or should we use a javascript-detection and/or linking to the seperate lang-pages?. I suppose Apache would be the way to go. On an L10N-infrastructural note, we should look at the way the homepage-module in the docs-project works, to make sure we can let the translators work with their favorite translation-tools. An xml/xsl combination seems to do the trick. Can we get these pages into CVS or something? - -- Bart <couf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <couf@xxxxxxxxx> key fingerprint: 6AAB 544D 3432 D013 776D 3602 ADB6 6B2A D93F 0F93 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGR3+2rbZrKtk/D5MRAk5aAJ0aXgniqqxbxrNI0dVpYeMEdpoUugCgiVvM V3rYOSWrkbDebD6TfPW168w= =KpUI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
