On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 10:34 +0200, Thomas Canniot wrote: > Le Sun, 8 Apr 2007 23:33:38 -0500, > "Patrick W. Barnes" <nman64@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > On Saturday 07 April 2007, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Karsten Wade schrieb: > > > > On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 17:05 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > >> Maybe simply sending the > > > >> stuff to a mailing list and placing a link to the archive in the > > > >> wiki would be more then enough? > > > > > > ,,, > > > > > > +1 -- how has the authority to issue such a policy? > > > > > > > If nobody has any big reason against it, we can call it policy right > > now. We just have to make sure that the people posting the meeting > > minutes are aware of it. :-) > > > > > Ok then a new mailing list will be created I guess. > > However, please reconsider sending a personal mail to every inactive > users. Sending a massive personal mail to people that did not checked a > box saying that they agree receiving mails from someone is considered as > spam. You could be reproached for this action. Not if the privacy policy[1] gets out of the draft state. The policy explicitly states that we can use account information to contact the account holder regarding their account. Was this held up in legal? If not, what's the status? = = = = = [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/PrivacyPolicy -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
