On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 14:36 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I'm curious as to how many visits we actually *get* for outdated docs, > which would be a good litmus test for whether we really need to maintain > them. This just came up because of two separate bug reports filed about the defunct Stateless Linux tutorial. It was linked from the /docs page but someone (*cough*notting*cough*) had vaporized the content in /web/html/docs/stateless. So I was trying to figure out how to respond. If you look at http://docs.fedoraproject.org today, you'll see some FC3 content in a separate section. I guess you are right; just thinking about how to save it all is wasting valuable brain time. We'll work on moving it out and leaving, "Go get it from CVS," pages in its place. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
