On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 00:50 -0600, Patrick W. Barnes wrote: > On Friday 23 February 2007, Thomas Chung wrote: > > On 2/23/07, Patrick W. Barnes <nman64@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'm referring to posts like > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/2007-February/msg00001 > >.html Do we really need to post this type of messages to our archive? > > From among posted messages, we cannot filter what hits the archives and what > does not, so the real question becomes "do we need the CVS messages posted to > the list?" In long-past discussions, the answer has been "yes." If you feel > the time has come to review the issue, let's hear your thoughts. I'm assuming the problem is the bulky and unattractive headers caused by CVS commits? -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
