On Monday 11 December 2006 11:25, Karsten Wade wrote: > > Yes, I agree with this. It was in fact the Wikipedia structure that I > had grown to like. However, I'd like to put it in as a rule with an > exception to drop or move the introduction. Drop if it is not needed > (self-evident what the page is), and put a long intro after the ToC if a > long intro is truly needed. > +1 > For FDP work, we'll surely follow the rule; but I think we should have > some flexibility in general project docs. Theory of minimal disruption. > I don't think we could count on absolute enforcement even if we wanted to. ;-) > > I think we should make the TableOfContents only display three nesting > levels and no more. If it is easy for people to custom that with the > macro, we can make the default two nesting levels and let people add a > third level if they need. > I don't recall how the macro works right now, but I would expect such a modification to be a simple patch. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgpMUYh8il7Di.pgp
Description: PGP signature
