On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 14:42 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 00:16 +0600, Russell John wrote: > > What about releasing the work under a Creative Commons license? Just a thought. > > I'm not sure I see the utility in doing so, especially since the vast, > vast majority of what's on these pages is very Fedora Project specific. > As such, not only is it probably material that needs to be protected > from potential user confusion and trademark dilution, but it's probably > also useless anywhere but where it is. Belated reply to make it clear that, at this time, the CC is not an optional license we can use for Fedora content. AIUI, the major objection is the lack of warranty protection, which is an important consideration in the US. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
