Max Spevack wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Paul W. Frields wrote: > >> On http://fedora.redhat.com and its subpages, the copyright notice at >> bottom seems to change dates from section to section, usually without >> reflecting reality (most of the pages were updated this year, for >> example, so it probably should say (C) 2002-2006). >> >> Also, shouldn't the copyright say "(C) 2002-2006 Red Hat, Inc. and >> others"? That's how most other content and code is marked >> distribution-wide, to reflect community contributions. IIRC this was >> the text approved by legal. Can all these notices be condensed to one >> include? > > Shouldn't we just turn off port 80 on fedora.redhat.com and point > people at the darn wiki or plone at this point? > > only partially in jest. > > Let's just get anything that's still useful off of f.r.c and kill the > darn thing. I know I've suggested as much before, but I'm kinda tired > of this dual-site crap. > > Isn't everyone else? > > --Max > I'd like to see fpserv take over the job. However, there needs to be upgrades to the plone version and thus the python and zope versions. I don't know if it would be more a pain to get centos running the version of python needed or if it would just be easier to get a Fedora setup. So far I have (and so has Fedora Unity) found plone very useful. We would *need* CacheFu otherwise plone can get very slow at times. This means we should be using plone 2.5. I need to start some more discussion on the infrastructure-list. If anyone would like to join me, please do. I'm busy with work during the day today and will try to forge a good email to send to the list(s). f.r.c should die and I think plone should be the one to kill it. Just my $.02. Jon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
