/me is still a bit uncertain about the goals of the plone migration. What is it that we need in a website, exactly, that the wiki at fp.o isn't giving us? It seems like maybe the reason we're not seeing Plone's progress is because it's not on the front burner, for whatever reason. The standard disclaimer: as always, I could be completely wrong. --g ------------------------------------------------------------- Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors ------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Dimitris Glezos wrote: > > Hi websites team, > > I tried searching for what's active team (current/planned actions, todo) > so that I can identify areas I could contribute... I wouldn't say my > search was particularly successful. :) > > I did find the following useful pages though: > > : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites/PloneToDo > Plone TODOs (no dates). > > : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/PloneIssues > A few DocsProject ideas/requirements for the new Plone site. > > : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/2006-June/msg00040.html > Some thoughts on IRC about Plone. > > > So, I'm throwing the idea of an IRC meeting, so that everyone will get > an update of what's going on, who is interested in helping out and > where, what's needed to be done, etc. > > I'll go one step further and throw a date too: Thursday 27/7 14:00 UTC [1]. > > -dim > > > [1]: > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2006&month=07&day=27&hour=14&min=0&sec=0 > > > -- > Dimitris Glezos > Jabber ID: glezos@xxxxxxxxxx, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B > http://dimitris.glezos.com/ > > > "He who gives up functionality for ease of use > loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous) > -- > > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list >
