Re: Installers not setting the boot flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/01/2025 21:49, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:23 PM Steve Underwood <coppice12@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just bought a new SSD, installed Fedora 41 on it to occupy the whole
disk, and it wouldn't boot. I tried Debian 12 and again it wouldn't
boot. I then tried Debian 11 and all was well. Afterwards I checked and
the Fedora 41 and Debian 12 installers are not setting the boot flag in
the MBR. Is there a good reason why these newer installers are doing
this, or is it a bug? Since there seems to be no warning to check this
flag after the install is complete it certainly feels like a bug.
Switch to GPT. MBR is so 1990's. GPT does not need an active, bootable
partition. It happens automatically with ESP. And GPT is not limited
to four partitions.

Then, reload the operating system.

Jeff

I thought I'd post a follow up about this, after doing more installs.

I agree that the time of the MBR should have passed for any hardware that is not ancient. I thought that Fedora 41 and Debian 12 were putting an MBR on the disc, because they had decided the old machines I was using could not handle a GPT disc, and UEFI boot. However, it appears both these installers will put an MBR on any disc of 2TB or less, even on the most modern machines, unless you force them not to with command line parameters as you boot the installer. Without forcing they use an MBR, but they don't set the boot flag. Maybe the testers use larger discs, and have not noticed this, although I would have expected a lot of testing to be done with SSDs these days, and anything over 2TB is still quite pricey. An interesting problem for two independent installation systems to have.

Regards,

Steve


--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux