On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 at 23:12, Felix Miata <mrmazda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Neither
color_list_installed_older=gray
color_list_installed_newer=gray
color_list_installed_reinstall=gray
color_list_installed_running_kernel=gray
color_list_installed_extra=gray
color_list_available_upgrade=gray
color_list_available_downgrade=gray
color_list_available_install=gray
color_list_available_reinstall=gray
color_list_available_running_kernel=gray
nor
color_list_installed_older=white
color_list_installed_newer=white
color_list_installed_reinstall=white
color_list_installed_running_kernel=white
color_list_installed_extra=white
color_list_available_upgrade=white
color_list_available_downgrade=white
color_list_available_install=white
color_list_available_reinstall=white
color_list_available_running_kernel=white
in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf produces any noticeable effect in 41 on running
dnf upgrade
Most reporting what it will do is in colors, while most output from proceeding
after y is bright white, with a bit of either red?, brown? or orange?.
What does the following show:
# ls -l `which dnf`
# dnf --dump-main-config | grep color
# dnf --setopt=color_list_available_upgrade=white check-update
The parsing of dnf is slightly picky about commas/spaces. If that doesn't show the expected values, check your config. If it does show the right values, don't know what to say.
Maybe strace the process execution. Do some more digging, there are some logs in /var/log/dnf* which might shed some light.
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
