On 12/19/24 12:09 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 23:46:31 -0600 (CST), Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command.
I have now and it seems to have done the job.
I hadn't before because it seemed like a generic suggestion,
like turn it off and on or reinstall Windows.
For some years, the number of conflicts (both implicit and explicit) in the
package collection has increased, unfortunately. The option --allowerasing
is sort of a big hammer, if users only specify that option when they run
into a failing transaction and then hope the tool will do the right thing
(as it replaces installed packages).
I've only had to use it with system-upgrade and in rare cases like this
where there's a conflict between rpmfusion and the main Fedora repos.
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
