> On 28 Nov 2024, at 21:41, Stephen Morris <steve.morris.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Just possibly off topic here, but quite some time ago I was playing around with python and needed a package (I don't remember which one it was) that wasn't installed, so I used pip3 to do the install and it installed a python 2 version into python 3, hence the package failed because of differences in the print function. Has anybody else encountered this issue, I'm suspecting a badly created package, but just wanted to confirm that it wasn't more widely spread, that if it was a defect within pip3 under certain conditions that it has been rectified? I follow python very closely and have not heard of this issue before. My guess is that it was an error with the meta data of the package and not a pip bug. Do you remember which package did this? Barry -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
