On 11/3/24 16:12, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well except for WINEHQ? The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17?? So, not clear why that happened. Believe is mentioned 8 packages needed downgrading, but didn't note what they were. Didn't use the alloweasing or other options. After the upgrade running dnf upgrade comes out with this. Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package wine-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64 - nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ Problem 2: package winehq-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires wine-devel = 1:9.20-1.1, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package winehq-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64 - nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ Package Arch Version Repository Size Skipping packages with broken dependencies: wine-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1 WineHQ 1.3 GiB winehq-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1 WineHQ 62.1 KiB Nothing to do. Note: winehq does not yet have a Fedora 41 repo. Only shows support for 39 and 40 on main page, but does have older repo directories going back to 25? So, not sure if this means Fedora Repos don't have these packages, or if they are needed in the winehq or other repos for 41?? The wine runs fine, but just convert from 9.20 to 9.17? Thanks.
Hi Mike, This is a bug I reported to WineHQ: Wine-staging 9.19-1 broken dependencies https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 The long and short of the story is WineHQ will get to it when they get to it. They actually got a little annoyed with me for trying to get them to jump pm the issue before FC41 went general release. In he mean time, this will get you your other updates and bypass WineHQ: sudo dnf upgrade --allowerasing --disablerepo=WineHQ HTH, -T (T/Mr.T/Todd/Dude/His Resplendence) -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
