Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tim:
>> I'm wondering what *less* user data separation means?

Barry:
> I assume it means using btrfs to put / and /home into the same file system.
> For a server the data that the server handles is in a separate file system.
> 
> The trade offs for a server and a desktop and different.
> 

The bit, in the post I replied to had a couple of aspects that piqued
my interest.

* One comment was quite understandable, with separating user data from
system data.  Where /home could be an independent partition, or a
directory, or one of those malleable pretend partitions.  Giving
differing controls over separation.

* The other comment was about separating different user data from each
other.  Which sounded like it meant user joebloggs versus user janedoe,
etc.

I have some NASs that are a complete minefield in that regards.  They
like to store data as owned by nobody, or everybody.  Then control
access by how you log on (very Windows 98-like).  Which doesn't help
when you access the data via some other method (e.g. NFS versus SMB)
and in the meantime it's made some directory be owned by someone else
and you lose access to it.  Then they have pseudo partitions of PUBLIC
versus your private files.  All in all, it's incoherent and
inconsistent.

I have mixed feelings about (allegedly) making things easier for the
technically illiterate.  Often it's not very well thought out, and it's
just another confusing way to do something, or dumbed down the point
where it's worse than useless.

And making computing easier for the less knowledgeable is the reason
why we had masses of computer viruses (people with little clue about
safe computing being exploited by asshats with no moral conscience). 
The blackhats who falsely claim to be improving things by discovering
flaws (and then exploiting them maliciously) should be treated like
arsonists (with derision and deprivation of liberty).

-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.119.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 4 14:43:51 UTC 2024 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 

-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux