Re: urgent major problem after f39 to f40 upgrade.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/10/24 3:45 PM, home user via users wrote:
(replying to multiple posts)

On 10/10/2024 3:45 PM, home user via users wrote:

On 10/10/2024 2:02 PM, home user via users wrote:
(I'm doing this from a windows-7 box)

This morning, I did my weekly patches for my f-39 stand-alone workstation.  No problems.

Then I did the upgrade to f-40.  I did not sit there and watch it. During the automatic reboot, it booted using the nouveau driver rather than the kmod one from rpm fusion non-free. During the post- upgrade task "remove-retired-packages", the workstation apparently crashed. Upon rebooting, it came up in console(?) mode; I could not get into graphics mode.

I shutdown again, and tried to boot into f-39.  But it came up f-40, console mode.

I  have neither "live" media nor installation media; last time I tried them, they didn't work.  F-40 console mode and window-7 are all I have to work with.

How do I get this workstation working properly in Fedora?

Also of note...

After the upgrade to f-40, my grub menu shows one f-40 entry, one f-39 entry, and a windows-7 entry.  But both Fedora entries boot to an f-40 console.  I assume it's a normal console window, but I'm not certain.

Hmmmm....

Maybe I was wrong.

(Samuel)

If I boot from the f-39 entry, uname -a says I'm running f-39.

If I boot from the f-40 entry, uname -a says I'm running f-40.

That uname is from the kernel version.

Regardless of which grub line I use to boot, rpm -qa | grep release gives this:

- - - - - -

flash-plugin-32.0.0.465-release.x86_64
fedora-release-identity-basic-39-36.noarch
fedora-release-common-39-36.noarch
fedora-release-39-36.noarch
rpmfusion-free-release-39-1.noarch
rpmfusion-nonfree-release-39-1.noarch

Ok, the install didn't get very far then.

Are these the things that I should dnf remove?

no

Regardless of which grub line I use to boot, rpm -qa | grep nvidia gives this:

It doesn't matter which grub entry you use, you're still booting the same system.

Am I correct in assuming it does not matter whether I boot from the f-39 or the f-40 grub entry when trying things?

Mostly correct, other than which kernel has the nvidia drivers available. But you're not using a graphical interface anyway.

It looks like the install crashed really early. Try doing the system-upgrade again.

--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux