warning in log during boot.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Good morning,

(f39 workstation last patched Thursday, August 22)

My boot logs (from journalctl -b > log20240826.txt) contain the warning below.  Note that for context, I'm including the last 5 lines before the warning and the first 5 lines after the warning. I also added line numbers.

- - - - - -

1021 Aug 26 08:01:58 coyote systemd[1]: RTC configured in localtime, applying delta of -360 minutes to system time.
1022 Aug 26 08:01:58 coyote systemd[1]: Relabeled /dev, /dev/shm, /run, /sys/fs/cgroup in 78.112ms.
1023 Aug 26 08:01:58 coyote systemd[1]: systemd 254.16-1.fc39 running in system mode (+PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX -APPARMOR +IMA +SMACK +SECCOMP -GCRYPT +GNUTLS +OPENSSL +ACL +BLKID +CURL +ELFUTILS +FIDO2 +IDN2 -IDN -IPTC +KMOD +LIBCRYPTSETUP +LIBFDISK +PCRE2 +PWQUALITY +P11KIT +QRENCODE +TPM2 +BZIP2 +LZ4 +XZ +ZLIB +ZSTD +BPF_FRAMEWORK +XKBCOMMON +UTMP +SYSVINIT default-hierarchy=unified)
1024 Aug 26 08:01:58 coyote systemd[1]: Detected architecture x86-64.
1025 Aug 26 08:01:58 coyote systemd[1]: bpf-lsm: LSM BPF program attached
/1026 Aug 26 08:01:58 coyote systemd-sysv-generator[595]: SysV service '/etc/rc.d/init.d/network' lacks a native systemd unit file. ~ Automatically generating a unit file for compatibility. Please update package to include a native systemd unit file, in order to make it safe, robust and future-proof. ! This compatibility logic is deprecated, expect removal soon. !/
1027 Aug 26 08:01:58 coyote systemd[1]: initrd-switch-root.service: Deactivated successfully.
1028 Aug 26 08:01:58 coyote systemd[1]: Stopped initrd-switch-root.service - Switch Root.
1029 Aug 26 08:01:58 coyote systemd[1]: systemd-journald.service: Scheduled restart job, restart counter is at 1.
1030 Aug 26 08:01:58 coyote systemd[1]: Created slice system-akmods\x2dkeygen.slice - Slice /system/akmods-keygen.
1031 Aug 26 08:01:58 coyote systemd[1]: Created slice system-getty.slice - Slice /system/getty.

- - - - - -

Line 1026 is the line of concern.

Is this a false alarm that I can ignore, or a ticking time bomb (a warning that needs attention soon), a problem for which I've been lucky to not yet see symptoms (other than the log entry), or a major immediate problem?

The warning suggests updating some package.  I do a "dnf upgrade" weekly.  Why did the update not already automatically happen?

--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux