home user: > > The problem is I don't know that the kernel is going to update until it's > > too late: when I run the "dnf upgrade". Francis: > I always do first a "dnf check-update", then if I agree: > > nohup dnf -y update & > > (a systemd-run will be even better/safer than nohup) > I *never* do a dnf -y. I always let it give me a list of things to do, read it, then press y (for yes). Firstly, I never develop the habit of blindly doing dnf without checking. And, secondly, I don't have to worry that something may change between doing a check then an update. I'm a bit surprised that an old nvidia package doesn't flag some sort of warning about a too-new kernel for it. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.119.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 4 14:43:51 UTC 2024 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
