It's interesting that both packages are available on F39. Is there a
reason to have both? And if only one should be installed which?
Paolo
On 7/20/24 14:27, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Go Canes wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 3:49 PM Paolo Galtieri <pgaltieri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I wonder then if this is an issue due to dnf upgrade? I've used dnf
upgrade to upgrade my system since at least F35. I wonder if at some
point there was a syslog file which then became rsyslog and the old
syslog file was never removed.
I've upgraded since before F35, and at F39 like Tom Horsely I have
/etc/logrotate.d/rsyslog, but not syslog.
In cases like this, using rpm¹ and/or dnf² to determine what
package provides each file is usually a good place to start.
In this case, rsyslog provides the rsyslog entry (not
surprisingly) and syslog-ng provides the syslog file.
If you are using rsyslog, you can uninstall syslog-ng to
remove the duplicate definitions in /etc/logrotate.d.
¹ rpm -qf /etc/logrotate.d/{,r}syslog
² dnf provides /etc/logrotate.d/{,r}syslog
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
