George,
On 2024-06-09 20:36, George N. White III wrote:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 4:35 PM Philip Rhoades via users
<users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
What I don't understand is that when creating the snapshots
originally,
the time to create them is almost zero but when using btrfs send to
the
other partition the times are _much_ longer. I guess it makes sense
that the first send of the first snapshot is slow, but why are the
second and third sends not much better?
Creating a snapshot only maniplates meta-data to mark blocks that
should be preserved (so they can be used if you need to roll back
to a snapshot).
Ah - right.
My previous script using rsync for incremental backups of a file
system
/ dir is faster - I can check the times if anyone is interested . .
rsync should be faster: send has to use the metadata to resconstruct
the files
while rsync uses the current filesystem which is highly optimimized to
take advantage of caches and parallel operations.
Right - that all makes sense - thanks!
P.
--
Philip Rhoades
PO Box 896
Cowra NSW 2794
Australia
E-mail: phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
