Jeffrey Walton writes:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 6:42 AM Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Tim via users writes: > > > Tim: > > >> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post- > > >> install? > > > > Kevin Fenzi: > > > No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact of the way > > > some installs work that it's there. There was some talk about it > > > removing itself at the end, but I am not sure where that ended up. > > > > I used to remove it, wasn't sure whether I could still do that. > > dnf remove systemd-resolved also removed it, without any issues. Didn't a simple removal cause the problems you are encountering?
Nope, quite the opposite: it was a simple addition. A dnf system-upgrade pulled in anaconda. Which pulled in system-resolved. Which overwrote /etc/resolv.conf
Uninstalling the whole mess actually mostly restored the symlink back to NetworkManager. Except that it was no-stub-resolv.conf originally. Which has the wrong selinux context, in F40. So, we're not out of the woods, just yet…
Attachment:
pgpkJqp1ZgzPO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
