On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 3:08 AM Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 3/22/24 00:02, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 2:52 AM Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 3/21/24 23:46, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 2:04 AM Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 3/18/24 18:09, Samuel Sieb wrote: > >>>>> On 3/18/24 17:49, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > >>>>>> Which scanner/copier does everyone use, that works out of the box with > >>>>>> Xsane?Printing would be nice but I already have an HP that does the > >>>>>> job for me. > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't use xsane, but my Brother multi-function color laser scans with > >>>>> the Gnome scanning app with no problems. It depends on what you mean by > >>>>> "out of the box". I did install a driver at one point and I assume > >>>>> that's still being used. > >>>> > >>>> I've now checked and I can't find any installed driver and cups says > >>>> it's "driverless", so that would imply it working out of the box and I > >>>> would expect any newer models to do the same. > >>> > >>> If it is driverless, it is probably using IPP or IPP over USB. See > >>> <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/cups-useful-tricks/>. > >> > >> Yes, it's a wifi printer and it's using IPP and it's working fine. I > >> was just clarifying my previous comment where I thought I had installed > >> a driver. > >> > >> Btw, my Fedora computer is apparently the only one that can print > >> double-sided properly to it. The phones and Windows computers will only > >> print short side flip for some reason even if long is selected. It's > >> very strange. > > > > That sounds like > > <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/cups-known-issues/#_there_are_less_options_available_if_the_device_is_used_as_driverless_than_with_a_classic_driver>. > > You got that completely backwards. I have no issues at all using > Fedora. It's everyone else that it isn't working for. >From the section: ... Some devices declare less options via protocols - f.e. IPP 2.0+, WSD, eSCL - which support driverless solutions than via classic drivers... It sounds like your WIndows machine is using WSD, and it is providing fewer options than IPP. Jeff -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
