On 3/10/24 19:18, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/10/24 18:39, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 3/10/24 16:52, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/10/24 16:40, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
And this is interesting:
# dnf install libicu-73.2-2.fc39.x86_64
Fedora 39 - x86_64 18 kB/s | 24 kB 00:01
Fedora 39 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 4.6 kB/s | 989 B 00:00
Fedora 39 - x86_64 - Updates 33 kB/s | 23 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 39 - Free 5.7 kB/s | 3.6 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 39 - Free - Updates 6.6 kB/s | 3.9 kB 00:00
Package libicu-73.2-2.fc39.x86_64 is already installed.
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Complete!
Yes, this is why it isn't working. You have (I assume) a qt5 package
that is linked with a previous version and somehow wasn't updated
when libicu was.
# rpm -qa qt* | grep -v fc39
<nothing>
I didn't mean a previous Fedora release. I meant that something is
linked against the previous version of libicu.
However, with some investigation, the 69 version was in F37 at the
latest, so something is strange on your system and is from a previous
release. I'm surprised other things aren't breaking.
I am at a loss to figure out who is the culprit. I will
just have to wait on the bug report
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
