Re: kernels > 6.5.12-300.fc39.x86_64 do not boot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Friday, February 16th, 2024 at 11:36 PM, Felix Miata <mrmazda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Samuel Sieb composed on 2024-02-16 16:34 (UTC-0800):
> 
> > On 2/16/24 09:23, olivares33561 via users wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > Feb 16 11:09:28 fedora kernel: ? __intel_display_power_get_domain.part.0+0x52/0x70 [i915]
> > > Feb 16 11:09:28 fedora kernel: ? ktime_get+0x3c/0xa0
> > > Feb 16 11:09:28 fedora kernel: ? exc_page_fault+0x7f/0x180
> > > Feb 16 11:09:28 fedora kernel: ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
> > > Feb 16 11:09:28 fedora kernel: ? icl_aux_pw_to_phy.isra.0+0x35/0x40 [i915]
> > > Feb 16 11:09:28 fedora kernel: icl_aux_power_well_disable+0x39/0x1d0 [i915]
> > > Feb 16 11:09:28 fedora kernel: intel_power_domains_sanitize_state+0x91/0xb0 [i915]
> > > Feb 16 11:09:28 fedora kernel: intel_display_driver_probe_nogem+0x163/0x210 [i915]
> > > Feb 16 11:09:28 fedora kernel: i915_driver_probe+0x707/0xbe0 [i915]
> 
> > An oops with a page fault in the i915 display driver relating to power
> > management. Somehow triggered by udev.
> 
> > No idea what would cause that, but it explains why nomodeset works.
> 
> 
> So perhaps intel_pstate= kernel cmdline appendages are worth trying?:
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt 31%
> down from top of file. I'd go first for hwp_only, next no_hwp, then ???
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.19/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.html
> 
> Has a BIOS upgrade already been checked for?
> --
> Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
> based on faith, not based on science.
> 
> Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
> 
> Felix Miata
> --

Dear Sir,

Tried out 

intel_pstate=hwp_only 
and
intel_pstate=no_hwp 

and none of these worked.  Still same situation.  Bios has been updated and I have to use nomodeset as kernel parameter to successfully boot.  Maybe another kernel 6.7.5 coming soon will fix the situation?

was not able to capture kernel output of journalctl :(

Best Regards,


Antonio 

--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux