On 1/10/24 12:39, Bob Marčan wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 12:19:30 -0600
"Thomas Cameron" <thomas.cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just checked my system, and it looks like it's set for 512k blocks:
[root@case ~]# blockdev --report /dev/nvme1n1p4
RO RA SSZ BSZ StartSec Size Device
rw 256 512 512 69216256 964765417472 /dev/nvme1n1p4
I assume the installer chose the block size, since I basically did a
"next, next, next" installation. Should I have chosen something different?
Thomas
[root@smicro bob]# di |grep nvme
/dev/nvme0n1p2 /boot 1.9G 0.5G 1.3G 32% ext4
/dev/nvme0n1p1 /boot/efi 1022.0M 17.4M 1004.6M 2% vfat <==
/dev/nvme1n1p4 /root-ssd1 849.9G 88.0G 718.6G 15% ext4
[root@smicro bob]#
[root@smicro bob]# blockdev --report /dev/nvme*
RO RA SSZ BSZ StartSec Size Device
blockdev: ioctl error on /dev/nvme0
rw 256 512 4096 0 1000204886016 /dev/nvme0n1
rw 256 512 512 2048 1073741824 /dev/nvme0n1p1 <==
rw 256 512 4096 2099200 2147483648 /dev/nvme0n1p2
rw 256 512 4096 6293504 68719476736 /dev/nvme0n1p3
rw 256 512 4096 140511232 928262389760 /dev/nvme0n1p4
blockdev: ioctl error on /dev/nvme1
rw 256 512 4096 0 1000204886016 /dev/nvme1n1
rw 256 512 4096 2048 1073741824 /dev/nvme1n1p1
rw 256 512 4096 2099200 2147483648 /dev/nvme1n1p2
rw 256 512 4096 6293504 68719476736 /dev/nvme1n1p3
rw 256 512 4096 140511232 928262389760 /dev/nvme1n1p4
[root@smicro bob]#
Ah, ok... I see. My first drive is a Windows drive, the second is Linux:
[root@case ~]# blockdev --report /dev/nvme*
RO RA SSZ BSZ StartSec Size Device
blockdev: ioctl error on /dev/nvme0
rw 256 512 4096 0 1000204886016 /dev/nvme0n1
rw 256 512 4096 2048 104857600 /dev/nvme0n1p1
rw 256 512 4096 206848 16777216 /dev/nvme0n1p2
rw 256 512 4096 239616 999373668352 /dev/nvme0n1p3
rw 256 512 4096 1952141312 706740224 /dev/nvme0n1p4
blockdev: ioctl error on /dev/nvme1
rw 256 512 4096 0 1000204886016 /dev/nvme1n1
rw 256 512 512 2048 629145600 /dev/nvme1n1p1
rw 256 512 512 1230848 1073741824 /dev/nvme1n1p2
rw 256 512 4096 3328000 33734787072 /dev/nvme1n1p3
rw 256 512 512 69216256 964765417472 /dev/nvme1n1p4
[root@case ~]#
I wonder why the installer chose a 512k block size on my largest
partition, but 4096 for my swap? I don't recall seeing a block size
option during installation, but I may very well have missed it.
I'll throw it out there again, though: should I have done something
different during installation?
--
Thomas
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue