Re: Starting Wayland FC39

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:17 PM Dave Close <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Until FC39, I had only run Wayland on one of my machines, not even
> >trying to bring it up on the others. Since I intensely dislike the
> >graphic login, I found a way to start it from a virtual terminal like
> >I normally start X11. Instead of "startx", I have a short script I call
> >"startw" that contains only the single line, "/usr/bin/dbus-run-session
> >/usr/bin/startplasma-wayland". (Yes, I run KDE.) This worked on FC38.
> >
> >Now on the same machine with FC39 (upgraded with system-upgrade) this
> >no longer works. Instead, it produces 248 lines of output and then
> >terminates. Reviewing those lines, it appears that it is complaining
> >about, 'failed to open drm device at "/dev/dri/card0"' and 'No suitable
> >DRM devices have been found'.  I'm not sure what device that refers
> >to but there seems to be some indication that it is my display. The
> >display certainly works fine for the virtual terminal I use to run
> >this script, and it also works fine for X11 if I run "startx".
> >
> >Ok, so as a fallback I tried a graphic login. This reaches a completely
> >blank screen and goes no further. The machine is up as I can reach it
> >with SSH but the display is useless. It responds to Ctrl-Alt-Delete
> >but nothing else. I can't get it to switch to a different desktop. I
> >noticed that SDDM defaults to Wayland so I changed "sddm.conf" to
> >include "DisplayServer=x11". The allowed the graphic login to reach
> >a login page but nothing I entered there was accepted even when I
> >switched to specify starting an X11 session instead of Wayland.
> >
> >There are some online references to a problem with the /dev/dri/card0
> >device but they are ancient and don't seem relevant.
> >
> >This machine is intended to run an application that only works on
> >Wayland (Waydroid) so at this point I'm stimied. Any suggestions
> >would be very helpful.
>
> After much searching, checking alternate users, verifying permissions,
> etc, I determined I was unlikely to find the problem. I took the coward's
> way out and downgraded the machine to FC38. After that, the problem is
> gone!
>
> I'll leave it at FC38 for a while while watching for any online comments
> that might provide a clue to a real solution.

Lol... +1.

Save your strength and fight another day!
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux