On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 11:04 -0500, Go Canes wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 8:43 AM Patrick O'Callaghan > <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I've emailed the manufacturer (TP-Link), though without much > > expectation of a reply. > > > > If it is as you say, it's a design fault. The power cycle is a > > definite > > Off, wait a second or so, then On. > > I have TP-Link KASA EP10 smart plugs and I don't see this behavior, > and at least one plug controls a device that would definitely be > impacted by such a power cycle. > This is a PM110, which is a low-end device. I'll take a look at the EP10 as a possible alternative. Of course it's always possible that I have a faulty one, > For the sake of completeness you might double/triple/quadruple check > that the plug doesn't have a schedule programmed. I already did that. > Assuming it doesn't > have its own schedule, is there any chance the plug is a member of a > group/scene/etc such that while the *plug* may not have a schedule, > it > is impacted by something else that does? There are no other smart plugs on the network. There are several Amazon Echo devices, which I think also implement the Matter protocol and can in theory talk to the TP-Link, but I've never configured them to do this and they don't have any scheduled activities. > Maybe try a factory reset on > the plug (assuming there is such a reset)? The docs say there is a factory reset, so I might try that. poc -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
