On 11/8/23 18:25, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 11/8/23 14:10, George N. White III wrote:
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 2:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users
<users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
One of my Fedora machines I just upgraded from fc38
to fc39 still have a ton of fc38 stuff in it. Is
that normal?
`uname -a` and `cat /etc/redhat-release` all say I
am on fc39.
But when I go to do a `dnf upgrade` I get tons of
fc38 stuff to upgrade to a newer fc38 version.
Am I missing something?
Some 3rd party software built from sources links to Fedora libraries. R
libraries are an example that has surprised some users when libraries go
missing after upgrades.
Some F38 packages where there have been no changes upstream and
that work in F39 may stay at F38 for a while, but there are also orphaned
packages that are no longer needed in F39. Some copr repositories may
not yet be fully updated for F39 and still need F38 packages. Jeffery
Walton's
post gives a way to clean out F38 packages that have either been
replaced by
F39 versions or are no longer needed, but it won't protect you if
there are 3rd
party binaries that link against 38 libraries.
--
George N. White III
Sound like it. Maybe I just jumped the gun.
Did a fresh `dnf upgrade`. Everything is coming up
fc39 now.
Next time I will wait a week before upgrading!
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
