On 10/25/23 13:35, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
rpm -qi $(rpm -qa | grep pubkey)
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 132
Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing an OpenPGP packet:
Failed to parse Signature Packet
because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP implementation, see <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>.
because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set in 101000 (28))
Header SHA1 digest: OK
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 134
Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing an OpenPGP packet:
Failed to parse Signature Packet
because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP implementation, see <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>.
because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set in 1111100 (7c))
Header SHA1 digest: OK
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 137
How can I associate the pubkeys with the package?
They aren't part of a package. They are independent data items. I'm
not sure if it's a pubkey or a package.
Should I rebuild the rpm databasis?
That won't do anything. The database is fine, it's the signature of
something in it that isn't.
Try running "rpm -qa --nosignature | grep pubkey" and see if that runs
without the error. That option isn't documented for querying, so I
don't know if it will have any effect.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
