On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 3:23 AM Patrick Dupre <pdupre@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > Is there a way to mount these partitions? > > Disk /dev/sdc: 3.83 MiB, 4014080 bytes, 7840 sectors > Disk model: Mass Storage > Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > Disklabel type: dos > Disk identifier: 0x73696420 > > Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type > /dev/sdc1 1919950958 2464388050 544437093 259.6G 20 unknown > /dev/sdc2 1330184202 1869160489 538976288 257G 6b unknown > /dev/sdc3 538989391 1937352302 1398362912 666.8G 53 OnTrack DM6 Aux3 > /dev/sdc4 * 1394627663 1394648999 21337 10.4M 49 unknown > > Partition table entries are not in disk order. > > > Actually /dev/sdc2 is mount ls /run/media/user > > It seems that sdc4 is bootable > The sizes seem bizarre Partition types are rather meaningless. They are there and everyone seems to set it, but when wrong it does not seem to matter. At best it is information that is sometimes right. I have not seen that the partition type has to have any relationship to what is actually on the partition. Ontrack was typically used to get around some windows size limit. What size is the disk? And odds are these are some variant of a windows fs. So do "mount /dev/sdc1 /somepointpoint" and see if it mounts and/or see what the error is in dmesg/messages when you try to mount it. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
