Re: signature issue with recent dnf update (fc38)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 15/09/2023 06.37, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:29:56AM +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
The below message shows, then the update proceeds to completion.
Is it a problem? Is there something I should do or is it something at the repository side (which one?).

I found articles suggested rebuilding the rpm db. However, since this problem happened on two machines
I find it unusual to have the same issue in the two databases.

[later] following a vague memory of looking into it before, I looked at an old package
	tux.x86_64  3.2.18-9.fc6  @System

and then

$ rpm -V tux.x86_64
error: Verifying a signature using certificate CAB44B996F27744E86127CDFB44269D04F2A6FD2 (Fedora Project <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx>):
   Key B44269D04F2A6FD2 invalid: not signing capable
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#      61
Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 4f2a6fd2: BAD
Header SHA1 digest: OK
package tux.x86_64 is not installed

Is it related?? Why the error showing now?

TIA

=====
Running transaction check
error: Verifying a signature using certificate CAB44B996F27744E86127CDFB44269D04F2A6FD2 (Fedora Project <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx>):
   Key B44269D04F2A6FD2 invalid: not signing capable
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#      61
Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 4f2a6fd2: BAD
Header SHA1 digest: OK
Transaction check succeeded.

This fc6 package (signed back in 2007) uses a SHA1 key thats no longer
acceptable to use on any recent Fedora version.

Are you running a fc6 system? Or where do you have this rpm?

I am not running fc6, I run fc38.

I'd strongly advise you to... not use a fc6 package at this point.

I am not using any. It is fluff left over after many upgrades since the early days of fedora.

Both dnf and rpm say the package is not installed and I cannot remove it.
I see that all the files of this package are installed.

I downloaded the rpm, how can I use this to remove the package (without reinstalling it first)?

kevin

--
Eyal Lebedinsky (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux