On 23 Jul 2023 at 7:50, stan via users wrote: Date sent: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 07:50:15 -0700 To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Cannot update Edge Organization: zohofree Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> From: stan via users <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Copies to: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx> > On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 14:47:08 +0100 > Paul Smith <phhs80@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > When trying to install Edge, I get the following error message: Don't know where you got file?? https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/edge/download?form=MA13FJ Page lists it as download. 151690868 Jul 24 02:08 microsoft-edge-stable-115.0.1901.183-1.x86_64.rpm rpm -K microsoft-edge-stable-115.0.1901.183-1.x86_64.rpm microsoft-edge-stable-115.0.1901.183-1.x86_64.rpm: digests signatures OK Don't know if they fixed the problem. I didn't actually go ahead and install it. The rpm -Uvh micro-* would install it?? Since it doesn't have a repo don't see how dnf would validate signature? Did see messages about problem in search, and there was something that said 115 had error, but 115-beta was ok. > > > > # dnf update > > Last metadata expiration check: 2:49:11 ago on Sun 23 Jul 2023 > > 11:55:12 AM WEST. Dependencies resolved. > > ================================================================================ > > Package Arch Version Repository > > Size > > ================================================================================ > > Upgrading: microsoft-edge-stable x86_64 115.0.1901.183-1 > > microsoft-edge 145 M > > > > Transaction Summary > > ================================================================================ > > Upgrade 1 Package > > > > Total size: 145 M > > Is this ok [y/N]: y > > Downloading Packages: > > [SKIPPED] microsoft-edge-stable-115.0.1901.183-1.x86_64.rpm: Already > > downloaded Problem opening package > > microsoft-edge-stable-115.0.1901.183-1.x86_64.rpm The downloaded > > packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. > > You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. > > Error: GPG check FAILED > > # > > > > Any ideas? > > I think that has to be a proprietary package. I can't find it in the > fedora repos. So, it is saying that the check to validate the package > was unchanged from when it was built failed. Is it because it was > altered? Is it because the gpg keys are mismatched? We don't know. > The place to bring this up is wherever you got the package. If you are > absolutely sure you want to install a potentially malignant package, > you can override the gpg check with the --nogpgcheck option. It says > that can be overridden in return, by the rpm policy. So you could > force install it using rpm directly. My advice is not to do that, but > to find why the chain of trust seems to be broken. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue +------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) mailto:mikes@xxxxxxxx mailto:msetzerii@xxxxxxxxx Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ +------------------------------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
