Re: rpm qa signatures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 3:58 PM ToddAndMargo via users
<users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I just upgraded to Fedora 38.
>
> When I went to ask "rpm" what my version of
> Xfce was,  I got a ton of this scrolling
> over my terminal:
>
> $ rpm -qa xfce4\*
> ...
> error: Verifying a signature using certificate
> 555FD53A996BB0E1029F7AF2AFF47E8B2A31FBDF (@virtmaint-sig_virt-preview
> (None) <@virtmaint-sig#virt-preview@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
>    1. Certificiate AFF47E8B2A31FBDF invalid: certificate is not alive
>        because: The primary key is not live
>        because: Expired on 2023-04-16T14:42:35Z
>    2. Key AFF47E8B2A31FBDF invalid: key is not alive
>        because: The primary key is not live
>        because: Expired on 2023-04-16T14:42:35Z
>
> What the heck?

GnuPG does not handle key management well. I don't know if it is due
to the OpenPGP spec or not.

The signature is likely good. A signature on something signed in the
past is still good even if the key used to apply the signature is now
retired.

A retired key cannot (should not?) be used to make new signatures once
the key expires. That does not look like it is the case here. (See
below on timestamp servers).

The only time a signature would become invalid is if the private key
was compromised. An expired key is not a compromised key. That does
not look like it is the case here.

And the certificate on the software package would need to include a
timestamp from a trusted TS server. Or something like a blockchain
that records the signature. I don't believe the key or certificate
includes the attestation, so there's no way to tell when the
certificate was actually signed.

Because there's no timestamp on the package, you get the nonsense above.

Jeff
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux