On 4/25/23 18:03, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:44:07 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Keyfiles vs. ifcfg
https://fedoramagazine.org/converting-networkmanager-from-ifcfg-to-keyfiles/
I converted when there was no longer default support for ifcfg
files unless I installed NetworkManager-initscripts-ifcfg-rh.x86_64
and edited the /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf file to
say try the ifcfg-rs plugin first. The command
nmcli connection migrate
seemed to work fine for me (which shocked me given how complex
I thought my network connections were). Been using keyfiles
ever since, no ifcfg files any longer.
I gave up and migrated as well.
What was annoying was that I could not create
the device link to the bridge with nmcli commands,
but it did properly create it with nmcli's
migrate.
And what is with the second bridge? `slave-type=bridge`
and `type=bridge`
bridge-br0.nmconnection
br0.nmconnection
which is apparently needed for the same bridge:
<bridge-br0.nmconnection>
[connection]
id=bridge-br0
uuid=cb23d052-f04d-4e0b-ae21-18cbc6yyyyyy
type=ethernet
interface-name=eno1
master=br0
slave-type=bridge
[ethernet]
[bridge-port]
</bridge-br0.nmconnection>
<br0.nmconnection>
[connection]
id=br0
uuid=8d395a48-3de6-40e8-ad3a-c57xxxxxxx
type=bridge
interface-name=br0
[ethernet]
[bridge]
[ipv4]
address1=192.168.255.10/24
method=manual
[ipv6]
addr-gen-mode=default
method=disabled
[proxy]
</<br0.nmconnection>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
