On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 5:18 PM Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Tom Horsley wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189656 > > > > God knows how many scripts I have that use "uname -p" to get > > the architecture name, but it now returns "unknown" instead of > > "x86_64". > > > > I guess I'll replace uname with a script that invokes the real > > uname unless it is called with the -p option, then echoes x86_64 :-). > > It's not a bug. :) > > A non-upstream patch was removed¹, which had kept the > long-deprecated uname -i and -p options. > > ¹ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/coreutils/c/cd953e1 uname (1) says -i and -p are valid options: -p, --processor print the processor type (non-portable) -i, --hardware-platform print the hardware platform (non-portable) > `uname -m` is probably what you want to use in those > scripts, if you were looking for x86_64 as the output. Jeff _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
