Thanks very much again!
I was explicitly able to update to texlive-was-svn64691-65.fc38.
However, my problem with the font error continues on the F38 machine.
What does it mean: !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file eurm10): Font eurm10 at 720 not found
Where does this come from?
Btw, I created the following LaTeX file font.tex:
%%%%%BEGIN FILE
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\begin{document}
$\upalpha,\upbeta,\upeta,\upmu,\upsigma$
\end{document}
%%%%%END FILE
$ pdflatex font
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.24 (TeX Live 2022) (preloaded format=pdflatex)
restricted \write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./font.tex
LaTeX2e <2022-06-01> patch level 5
L3 programming layer <2022-12-17>
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/article.cls
Document Class: article 2021/10/04 v1.4n Standard LaTeX document class
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/size12.clo))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/was/upgreek.sty)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/l3backend/l3backend-pdftex.def)
(./font.aux) [1{/usr/share/texlive/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map
}] (./font.aux)
kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag 1+120/600 --dpi 720 eurm10
mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10.
mktexpk: perhaps eurm10 is missing from the map file.
kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log.
)
!pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file eurm10): Font eurm10 at 720 not found
==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
However, this compiles without error, just as it should, on my F37 machine.
Many thanks again, and best wishes,
Ranjan
> > Any more suggestions?
>
> There was another question about this on the devel list. As near as I
> can see in koji, there is no texlive-was-9 package.
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5402
>
> The rpm that contains upgreek.sty seems to be
> Name texlive-was
> Version svn64691
> Release 65.fc38
> Epoch 10
> Arch noarch
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=33310676
> in F38. Here is the Provides:
> Provides
> tex(icomma.sty) = 2022
> tex(upgreek.sty) = 2022
> tex-was = 2022
> texlive-was = 10:svn64691-65.fc38 <----- not sure what this is, an
> alternate name?
>
> There is also, in f37,
> Name texlive-was
> Version svn21439.0
> Release 60.fc37
> Epoch 9
> Arch noarch
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=33634957
>
> Provides
> tex(fixmath.sty) = 2021
> tex(gensymb.sty) = 2021
> tex(icomma.sty) = 2021
> tex(upgreek.sty) = 2021
> tex-was = 2021
> texlive-was = 9:svn21439.0-60.fc37 <----- not sure what this is, an
> alternate name?
>
> It looks like the epoch changes, and somehow messes up the update.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
