On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:59:48 -0000 "Andre Robatino" <robatino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:59:59 -0700 > > Jonathan Ryshpan <jonrysh(a)pacbell.net> wrote: > > > > > > I masked systemd-oomd.service because I have real swap, > > Masking it is unreliable because it might start running again if > system-oomd-defaults is updated or reinstalled. (To check this, try > reinstalling it.) It's better to just remove the system-oomd-defaults > package. That way, systemd-oomd.service continues to run, but it's > not monitoring anything (as verified with oomctl). So, I have it masked, and this shows from systemctl, systemd-oomd.service masked inactive dead systemd-oomd.service However, I don't have the systemd-oomd-defaults package installed so I can't say whether that would cause it to start while being masked or not. Perhaps I will give that a try at some point. If it is being started despite being masked, that is definitely a bug. Masking is supposed to be inviolable. Since systemd-oomd is part of the main systemd package, that would be the package to file the bug against. It is possible that it is not checking the service status if the systemd-oomd-defaults package is installed. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
