Taking better advantage of BTRFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, I'm anticipating a firestorm of BS responses on this, but here goes anyway.

We've now had BTRFS as the default filesystem for some time in Fedora.  However, there has been almost nothing done to take advantage of its capabilities.  This leads to some obvious questions about future work:

1) When are we going to see removal of the EXT2 /boot partition? It is no longer required, as the boot process has been able to use BTRFS for years now.

2) When are we going to see timeshifting tools built into the desktop, ala Solaris?  That's incredibly useful for developers.

3) The existing Windows-like update mechanism is undesirable. It solves a non-existent problem on filesystems with inodes. Like all Unix-like systems, even Ubuntu does not require this. The ability to snapshot means that the weird reasoning that requires 2 reboots to install virtually all update packages is no longer required under any circumstances.  When is the software update mechanism getting a fundamental redesign?

4) When is a standard backup mechanism that takes advantage of snapshotting going to be in the distro?  The published backup packages do not seem to be aware of the better capabilities available in BTRFS.  Wrapping a few CLI tools in a GUI seems like it should be obvious, maybe 200 lines of shellscript or less.

5) If you encrypt your filesystems, the BTRFS built-in encryption mechanism is not used.  Why not?  LUKS is still in use, even though that is more complicated and slower.  I note the possible ability to encrypt being added if F38, but it seems like baby steps when a general solution is already in the code.

6) Compression is not the default.  Why not?  SSDs are 10x slower and disks are 100x slower than the processors of even 10 years ago, so this omission is slowing the system down.

7) Keep the last 3 update snapshots, not just the last 3 kernels.  This would keep backout scenarios a lot more consistent and functional.

If I look at the changes coming in Fedora 38, I am disappointed in the lack of innovation.  All of these items should be in there to make the system cleaner, better and faster.  Most of these asks have already been in SUSE for many years now, and are well debugged and understood.  Fedora is supposed to be leading the way at the edge, not way behind it.  Or am I missing something about the politics of the distro?

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux