On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:42:28 -0500 Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:33 PM Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2023-02-04 at 13:55 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > I think the use of multiple excludepkgs is intuitive. Each time > > > you want to pin a package, you add an excludepkgs. > > > > I don't. It flies in the face of many other configuration files > > that I've adjusted. If I do something like the following in one > > file: > > I hope multiple configuration files in config.d/ directories don't > offend your delicate sensibilities. That isn't the same thing. Config.d directories are designated as places where multiple configuration files are placed. Tim is talking about historical convention for a single configuration file. And the way you phrased your response comes across as sarcastic and demeaning, almost as a personal attack. Maybe you didn't mean it that way, but that's how I would interpret it. You could have said something like, "What about multiple configuration files in config.d directories? Doesn't that contradict what you are saying?" _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
