On 12/31/22 18:47, Bill C wrote:
Ok they are /usr/i686-w64-mingw32 and the same only with x86_64-mingw32
and such. I used rpm -qa | grep mingw and got nothing. So there's no
package installed on my system called "mingw" anything. Possibly ming is
installed though.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022, 9:21 PM Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx
<mailto:samuel@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On 12/31/22 17:56, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I reinstalled my system and one reason was to take a look at these
> directories that are odd. I choose minimal install and no hypervisor
> checkbox. In /usr is two directories one is i686-mingw32- and
another is
> x86_64-mingw32- or so directories.
>
> Now inside these is a directory called sys-root and inside a Locale
> directory an directories for languages such as 'ca' and so on.
rpm -qf
> said these directories were not owned by any package. I find this
very
> odd myself. This was not present in f36. Only the 'afs' directory at
> root and I know it is supposed to be there. IDK if anyone else
notices
> this or not. Not owned by anything. Maybe my tweaks have done it.
I can
> check if there is any mingw packages installed I simply choose 'C
> Development tools' and add 'indent'. All I do for development
type things.
Which directories are you seeing as not owned? Other than the specific
.mo localization files, everything is owned by mingw64-filesystem.
It's likely that the localization files don't bring in the filesystem
package.
Run "find /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32 -name '*.mo'" and then "rpm -q" on the
files it finds.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
